How not to waste time on pointless discussion about personal preferences? Use consent and experiments to bypass them.
Category: sociocracy
Sociocracy, also called dynamic governance, is a system of governance which seeks to create harmonious social environments and productive organizations. It is distinguished by the use of consent, rather than majority voting, in decision-making, and of discussion by people who know each other. (copied from Wikipedia)
Decider AKA Hand Gestures
If only decision taking was as simple as presenting your thumb up or down! Well, actually, it can be. 🙂
The secret of successful meetings? It is you.
There is one host (facilitator) and usually 5-8 participants. Now, whose behavior has more impact on the meeting effectiveness?
On Decisions and Consequences
How to close the gap between decision makers and the consequences of their decisions? Some insights from Management 3.0 and Sociocracy 3.0.
Transparency in Scrum and Sociocracy 3.0
The different approach to transparency by Scrum and Sociocracy 3.0.
Sociocracy 3.0 Effectiveness Review – Part 4
Effectiveness review AKA Peer review – a process of helping others to become better in their role. Been there, done that. Part IV
Sociocracy 3.0 Effectiveness Review – Part 3
Effectiveness review AKA Peer review – a process of helping others to become better in their role. Been there, done that. Part IV
Meetings – efficiency vs. human element
Are people happy with effective meetings? Or maybe the social element of endless discussions is what they crave for?
Sociocracy 3.0 Effectiveness Review – Part 2
Effectiveness review AKA Peer review – a process of helping others to become better in their role. Been there, done that. Part II
Sociocracy 3.0 Effectiveness Review
Effectiveness review AKA Peer review – a process of helping others to become better in their role. Been there, done that. Part I